Format: Print Length

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 11.43 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

Using data from the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), nuclear scientist Leuren Moret calculates that the estimated 2,500+ tons of depleted uranium used against Iraq in 1991 and 2003 is sufficient to cause 25 million new cancers.21 Is it a coincidence that the population of Iraq, according to the CIA, is 25 million? The Germans did not examine ultrapure graphite because they did not know that the graphite they had tried was too impure to sustain a chain reaction, and abandoned it as a possible moderator.

Pages: 296

Publisher: Cornell University Press; 1 edition (April 15, 2013)


Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint (Studies in Security and International Affairs Ser.)

How to Lose a War (Spokesman)

The Legacy of Hiroshima

The Rickover Effect: How One Man Made A Difference

Navies in the Nuclear Age: Warships Since 1945 (Conway's History of the Ship)

The Gravest Danger: Nuclear Weapons (Hoover Institution Press Publication)

Encyclopedia of Strategic Nuclear Forces - Missiles, Bombers, Submarines, Triad, Warheads, Modernization Plans, ICBM, SLBM, START Treaty, Long-Range Standoff (LRSO), Global Strike, Verification

Specifically, the effects of a 10-20-kiloton nuclear weapon include: At the center of the blast (ground zero) the overpressures are greater than 20 pounds per square inch (psi), sufficient to destroy all but the skeletons of reinforced concrete structures. At approximately 0.6 mile (1.0 km) from the center of the blast, the overpressures are about 10 psi, sufficient to destroy all wood and brick-built structures , e.g. The United Nations and Nuclear read for free Nukefix shows that it takes only 354 to 800 Russian warheads to destroy every city and town in the United States that has a population density in excess of 1,000 people per square mile (all urban and metropolitan USA, 36.3% of the U. The highly-publicized START II treaty levels of 3,000 to 3,500 deliverable warheads by year 2007 (roughly a decade from now) offer little protection The Cuban Missile Crisis: A read for free President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed ref.: Nuclear Fallout from the read for free If the Israelis do have nukes, then they built them to deter their Arab neighbors. malnourished troops and aging Soviet tech, has had five successful tests Why Israel Can't Wait: The Coming War Between Israel and Iran President Obama will end his Presidency pretty much the same way he began it: with a call to the world to rid itself of nuclear arms—this time at Hiroshima, the site of the first atomic weapon used in war. Too bad he did so little to reach that goal during the intervening seven years , cited: Duck and Cover (Civil Defense Book 3) Before studying an alternate bipolar system in further detail, the question of Japan must be addressed. There is considerable academic debate on whether the atomic bombs were needed to end the Pacific war, and whether they were used to end Japanese resistance as opposed to intimidating the Soviets , cited: Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation download here.

While most discussions of thermonuclear war generally emphasize only one or another of the above sets of variables, all three sets must be considered in an integrated way. (Only two works seem to have attempted this: Kissinger 1957; Strausz-Hupe et al. 1959.) Failure to do so constitutes a major source of misunderstandings about deterrence , cited: Nuclear War in the 1980's read online read online. By now I realized that as long as a nuclear explosive was used in anger, U. S. policy held the type of explosive and geographical location of detonation to be absolutely irrelevant. The cardinal point was that it was the act of detonating the explosive in anger that was a political taboo.[88] Cohens fictitious weapons amounted to an explicitand ingeniousdevice for exploring the scope and content of the taboo, which he did not personally share Indo-U.S. Civil Nuclear Deal download for free download for free.

Nuclear Policies in Europe (Adelphi series)

Nuclear Zero?: Lessons from the Last Time We Were There

The United States continues to spend some $25-$35 billion annually on research, development and maintenance of its nuclear arsenal. All of these misspent resources represent lost opportunities for improving the health, education and welfare of the people of the world. 9 The Arms Race in the Era of Star Wars Those strikes would not have succeeded had Israel not been able to identify the targets accurately Britain and the H-Bomb read for free While the civilian economy plummets, extensive financial resources are funneled towards America�s war machine. In North America and the European Union, State resources which had previously been tagged to finance health and education have been redirected towards defense. The war economy will not resolve the mounting tide of unemployment. This new direction of the US economy geared towards the military industrial complex, will generate hundreds of billions of dollars of surplus profits, while contributing very marginally to the rehabilitation of the employment of specialised scientific, technical and professional workers laid-off in recent years in the civilian sectors of economic activity ref.: Globalization and the Nature of War At the other are the statements by General James Gavin, head of Army research and development, who testified before Congress in 1956 and 1957 and requested 151,000 nuclear warheads just for the Army (a figure justified by plans envisioning the use of as many as 423 warheads in a single day of "intense combat"), and a declassified Department of Defense report —History of the Custody and Deployment of Nuclear Weapons—that presents, almost as an afterthought, this sentence: "Finally, in June 1958, the [Joint Chiefs of Staff] after careful study, recommended a stockpile level of from 51,000 to 73,000 warheads by 1968."[6] Such figures are all the more remarkable considering that annual production peaked in 1960 at 7,178 warheads and that the United States built a total of 70,000 warheads during the entire Cold War Democracy and Deterrence read here

History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Volume III: The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy 1950 - 1951, The Korean War Part One - Attack and Response, MacArthur, Chinese Intervention

Back to the Brink

American-Ukrainian Nuclear Relations

Disarming Iraq: Monitoring Power and Resistance

Counter-Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Operations - Air Force Doctrine Document (AFDD) 3-40

Counsels of War (Oxford Paperbacks)

The Bomb in the Basement: How Israel Went Nuclear and What That Means for the World

Atomic energy and the hydrogen bomb

Remembering Hiroshima: Was it Just? (Justice, International Law and Global Security)

Trading in Death: Weapons, Warfare and the Modern Arms Race

THE HYDROGEN BOMB The Men, the Menace, the Mechanism

Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence (Princeton Legacy Library)

100 Years of Royal Navy Submarines

Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence (Princeton Legacy Library)

Nuclear Endings: Stopping War on Time

History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Volume IX: The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy 1965-1968 - Vietnam War, ABM, NATO, Six-Day War, Africa, U.S.S. Liberty, Pueblo

Military Persuasion: Deterrence and Provocation in Crisis and War

Aerospace Defence: A Holistic Appraisal

S. nuclear primacy plans, Russia could feel compelled to attack the United States for acts like a U , e.g. U.S.-UK Nuclear Cooperation After 50 Years (Significant Issues Series) These chain reactions are already far advanced and taking place, at least for those of us who are attentive, right before our eyes.. It is the magnitude of the vast pools of nuclear waste stored at Fukushima #1 and at many other nuclear power plants that give these installations the potential to become far more destructive than nuclear weapons , cited: Five Days in August: How World read here If each side views the other�s strategic forces as designed for fighting wars as much as, or more than, for deterring them, then arms races become very difficult to avoid. Such percep�tions vary with changes in the strategies and forces of the great powers, not of the lesser ones. Great powers engage in arms races main�ly because of what other great powers do ref.: The Rise and Fall of Nuclearism: Fear and Faith as Determinants of the Arms Race The Rise and Fall of Nuclearism: Fear. After nearly 13 years of speculation surrounding North Korea's nuclear capabilities, the October 9th nuclear test confirmed North Korea as the world's eighth declared nuclear power , source: Britain's Strategic Nuclear download online When such requirements were combined with a lack of knowledge about the current or cumulative cost of the nuclear weapons program, inadequate intelligence about and fear of the capabilities and intentions of U. S. adversaries (principally the Soviet Union), and a blanket of secrecy that kept the public, the news media, and even some policymakers in the dark, all the ingredients for a largely unconstrained competition were present , source: When Help Never Came S. government conducted internal discussion and discussions with Japanese government officials regarding the possible re-introduction of nuclear weapons onto Okinawa in the event of an emergency or crisis situation.” Although widely known — various accounts and documents of a secret deal had previously shed light on the storage of atomic weapons on the islands both before and after Okinawa’s reversion — the issue had been controversial because Japanese leaders and U , e.g. The Future of Nuclear download here The 3400 and 1209 DGZs in the unrestricted and restricted lists are worth comparing with the first Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP), the war plan prepared in 1960 by the SAC-controlled Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff.� If the U The United Kingdom and Nuclear read here The United Kingdom and Nuclear. S and Russia are still trying to reduce nuclear arms so that maybe one day there will not be anymore nuclear weapons , e.g. Iran and Nuclear Weapons: Protracted Conflict and Proliferation (Routledge Global Security Studies) It also needs to link these terrorist threats to "State sponsorship" by so-called "rogue states." Spelled out in the 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS), the preemptive "defensive war" doctrine and the "war on terrorism" against Al Qaeda constitute essential building blocks of the Pentagon's propaganda campaign , source: The Rising Sun Sets: The Complete Story of the Bombing of Nagasaki S. policy was for massive retaliation with Strategic Air Command bombers in the event of war with the USSR Deterrence and Security in the 21st Century: China, Britain, France, and the Enduring Legacy of the Nuclear Revolution read online. About one-third of Israel's military forces survived the Russian nuclear attack; they are now occasionally using nuclear artillery shells against attacking troops In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist (Princeton Series in Physics) In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer,.

Rated 4.2/5
based on 227 customer reviews