Download Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite by Christian Laes PDF
By Christian Laes
This is often the 1st quantity ever to systematically learn the topic of disabilities within the Roman international. The members research the subject a capite advert calcem, from head to toe. Chapters care for psychological and highbrow incapacity, alcoholism, visible impairment, speech problems, hermaphroditism, immense births, mobility difficulties, osteology and visible representations of disparate our bodies. The authors absolutely interact with literary, papyrological, and epigraphical assets, whereas iconography and osteo-archaeology are taken into consideration. additionally the past due old proof is considered. Refraining from an intensive constructionist point of view, the members recognize the potential of getting to know major modifications within the means impairment used to be culturally considered or assessed.
Read Online or Download Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite Ad Calcem PDF
Similar special topics books
From the time of Hippocrates until eventually the Twenties, massaging lady sufferers to orgasm used to be a staple of scientific perform between Western physicians within the therapy of "hysteria," an disease as soon as thought of either universal and protracted in girls. medical professionals loathed this time-consuming method and for hundreds of years depended on midwives.
Fix of straightforward and intricate belly hernias by means of the laparoscopic strategy is now the strategy of selection in lots of facilities. Laparoscopic fix bargains an identical results to open fix, with the extra advantages of higher sufferer pride and diminished hospitalization. For a few hernias, particularly incisional and hiatal, the end result seems to be stronger utilizing the minimally invasive strategy.
This ebook examines 4 scientific techniques that epitomize the pitfalls of development: DES, a man-made estrogen prescribed to thousands of girls to avoid miscarriages, which produced devastating unwanted effects; the substitute center; the 1976 swine flu immunization application; and genetic engineering. Dutton and the members hint the human offerings that govern scientific and clinical innovation and discover the political, financial, and social components that effect these offerings.
Drawing upon a myriad of fundamental and secondary historic assets, The Royal medical professionals: scientific body of workers on the Tudor and Stuart Courts investigates the influential people who attended England's most crucial sufferers in the course of a pivotal epoch within the evolution of the nation and the scientific occupation.
Additional info for Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite Ad Calcem
See also Clark, Rose in this volume. f. goodey and m. lynn rose an ancient text will supply an adjective or substantive more often than a noun—it will correspond with the set of characteristics that we attach today to an equivalent-sounding label. 20 On the evidence, the category of intellectual disability in particular demands a strong scepticism: that is, there is more or less no cross-historical correspondence at all. Intellectually disabled people—so say the cognitive psychologist and the doctors, teachers and social workers who follow her lead—lack intelligence defined by such characteristics as the ability to generalise or make abstractions, to reason logically, to process information or maintain attention.
Lynn rose heart, in which πνεῦµα functioned. Thought events, and likewise their moral and behavioural connotations, were secondary indicators of the health of these organs. A healthy temperament or complexion (κρᾶσις) in a bodily organ consisted of the traditional Hippocratic qualities of hot, cold, wet, and dry; an imbalance of these material qualities in some sense simply was a cognitive impairment. In this picture there is no dualism, or even mere complementarity, between intellectual and physiological elements.
By the time of Alexander’s text the word clearly means lay people: non-philosophers. Our translation of this fluctuating and charged term (idiocy was an important criterion in the era of nineteenth- and twentieth-century eugenic practice) remains deliberately anachronistic. It forces us to ask: exactly what characteristics qualified one for the label of idiocy? The logic of this passage is that Alexander’s philosophical opponents, the Stoics, were the idiots. This is not a normal insulting of one’s peers by referring to them as intellectually disabled or ‘retarded,’ since no distinct intellectually disabled population like ours was recognised at the time.