Download The illusion of accountability in the European Union by Sverker Gustavsson, Christer Karlsson, Thomas Persson PDF
By Sverker Gustavsson, Christer Karlsson, Thomas Persson
This publication examines responsibility within the ecu from various views and considers even if ecu voters have genuine possibilities for containing decision-makers dependable. This booklet severely analyses 5 arguments which declare there are adequate ability for containing decision-makers to account within the Union. The authors examine:
- The argument that we must always reconsider the that means of responsibility within the european context
- The declare that there's no responsibility deficit within the european simply because member states have the ability to retrieve all delegated competencies
- The statement that european voters have powerful mechanisms for containing these answerable for legislative decision-making to account
- The competition that the preparations that receive at the present for containing the administrative energy within the ecu to account are acceptable
- The trust that the involvement of organised civil society can paintings instead to standard sorts of accountability
The major end is that the present institutional set-up and perform of decision-making within the ecu is person who only creates an phantasm of responsibility.
Using a strict framework targeting the adaptation among formal mechanisms and genuine possibilities for responsibility, this hugely coherent quantity might be of curiosity to scholars and students of eu politics, specifically these drawn to the democratic foundations of the eu political system.
Read or Download The illusion of accountability in the European Union PDF
Similar public affairs & administration books
Few topics are extra motivated by way of philosophy than the shape of governance that courses and administers public affairs, but a lot of the literature approximately public management continues to be silent approximately this connection. guide of association idea and administration: The Philosophical technique, moment variation identifies and discusses a number of the most vital philosophies and pursuits that experience encouraged modern public management.
Public providers contact the vast majority of humans in complex and constructing economies each day: young children require education, the aged want own care and counsel, garbage wishes amassing, water needs to be secure to drink and the streets desire policing. briefly, there's essentially no zone of our lives that may not touched ultimately by way of public prone.
This ebook analyses the politics of the great diversity of corporations that make up the general public quarter clear of Whitehall and Westminster. It offers with the heritage, policy-making, and inter-governmental kin of neighborhood executive, the NHS, quangos and the outposts of critical executive. a great introductory textual content for college students of politics and public management and for an individual interested by this a part of the executive computing device of england.
- Reshaping National Intelligence for an Age of Information (RAND Studies in Policy Analysis)
- The Civil Service in Hong Kong: Continuity and Change
- In Defense of Politics in Public Administration: A Value Pluralist Perspective (Public Admin: Criticism and Creativity)
- Acceptable Risks: Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies
- The Next Wave: Using Digital Technology to Further Social and Political Innovation (Brookings FOCUS Book)
Additional info for The illusion of accountability in the European Union
So do Exxon-Mobil and British Petroleum: it is not accidental that tankers owned by brand-name corporations are safer, on average, than those owned by anonymous entities (Mitchell 1994). Two other forms of accountability may exert some impact even on powerful states. Peer accountability refers to ways in which organisations may criticise the operations of similar organisations, often through multilateral organisations. National ﬁnancial policies are subject to criticism by other states, directly and in the context of organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Bank for International Settlements.
At the same time, however, it has not yet developed the kind of dominance structures that render direct-democratic instruments ineﬀective (least of all does it exhibit, for example, a high partyness of society). Such instruments oﬀer, it would appear, the only way of making EU decision-making both responsive and accountable to the peoples of Europe – and hence democratic: democratic in the sense of demoicracy. ) history, and not least by the pride the multiple demoi take in making up their democracy – cannot be expected to do so well in a ‘young’ Union, the multiple demoi of which view each other with distrust as foreigners.
The processes by which ﬁnancial markets constrain the actions of democratic governments are inherently undemocratic: almost by deﬁnition, ﬁnancial markets are controlled by the rich. Yet democracies have strong tendencies to put future generations at risk, or under debt burdens, for the sake of gratifying current voters and interest groups. By increasing the costs of debt beyond a certain point, ﬁnancial markets may constrain this particular abuse of the power of adults now over succeeding generations.